Workings of House Quæstor (Quæsitor)
- Symbol and Sigil
- Ranks and Privileges
- Iudicium
Symbol and Sigil
The singularly recognizable and often feared symbol of the
Quaestors is the fasces (pronounced "FAS-eez"
and meaning 'bundles'). This device is a collection of 21 wooden
sticks or iron rods bundled tightly together and entwined with
a leather strap. In the middle of the sticks and protruding from
their top is a small double-bladed iron axe (since most fasces
are only about one foot long, the miniature axe is merely symbolic,
and in fact sometimes absent altogether; in this case the axe's
presence is implied). Although they were Etruscan in origin, the
fasces were a symbol of bureaucratic power and judicial law in
ancient Rome. Magistrates bore them in public places to signify
the authority of their rulings, and when the House of Quaestors
was created within the Order, they adopted this Roman tradition.
The sticks of the fasces symbolize the concentrated power of the
different Houses of the Order, one stick representing each House
(note that the Rabenstein and Corona Montis sagas use Additional
Houses), while the blade of the axe they encompass denotes
the absolute authority of the judgments of the Quaestors (it is
the executioner's axe that the Etruscans used to enact capital
justice).
Each Quaestor has their own fasces which they use not only
to establish their rank and authority as a magistrate, but also
as a Hermetic sigil. It is forbidden by the Code of Hermes to
refute the authority of the bearer of a fasces. Conversely however,
it is not required to recognize the authority of a Quaestor who
does not bear their fasces (though it may prove imprudent to do
so; thefts of fasces to delay or obstruct Hermetic justice have
been known to occur, but rarely have the culprits not been subjected
to serious punishments for this offense). Use of a fasces to confer
authority by someone who is not a Quaestor is a high crime within
the Order.
A unique fasces is employed by the head Quaestor of each of
the individual Tribunal meetings (the Praefectus), whose rods
are often over 3 feet long and surround a very real axe. Too large
and unwieldy to be carried by a single person, these fasces are
born by a procession of preceeding attendants called 'lictors'
(normally younger Quaestors themselves). The central axe of this
ceremonial fasces has been used to deliver Hermetic justice to
renounced magi in the past, and in some Tribunals their blood
stains smear the blade still, making the ceremonial entrance of
the fasces into the regular Tribunal meetings an ominous moment.
Note that the 20th century term 'Facsism' derives from the totalitarian
authority conferred upon the wielder of the bundles.
Ranks and Privileges
While the power of jurisdiction of House Quaestor is well-established
throughout the Order, the individual powers and responsibilities
among the magi who comprise this House is considerably varied
and highly regulated, to ensure that abuses do not occur and the
rule of law prevails. Technically all members of the House may
be called 'Quaestor,' meaning 'magistrate.' But this title is
largely ceremonial and is typically preceded by the magus' formal
rank. These offices are known throughout the Order (at least by
those well-versed in Hermetic Law), and are detailed below (from
lowest to highest):
- Lictor
- Indagator
- Prætor Urbanus
- Prætor Peregrinus
- Annalium Scriptor
- Præfectus
- A Lictor (plural lictoris) is among the least
powerful members of the House, serving as a public attendant
to the more powerful magistrates within the Order. The term 'lictor
'has no applicable translation, but descends rather from the
title of the servants of Roman magistrates during the Empire.
Lictoris are typically young, often maturing apprentices or beginning
magi, and can be thought of as judges-in-training (all members
of House Quaestor serve as a Lictor for some time). Lictoris
can often be found accompanying senior magistrates, observing
inquiries, or assisting in criminal proceedings. It is their
formal responsibility to bear the ceremonial fasces into any
criminal trial or tribunal. It is also their somber duty to wield
the axe of the fasces in cases of serious Hermetic crimes, acting
as executioners (carnifex) of Hermetic judgement. They
are the only rank among House Quaestor which may not sit upon
an Iudicium (trial) as a juror.
- An Indagator (plural indagatoris) is an investigator,
and travels throughout the lands and covenants of Europe to police
the realm, responding to allegations of misdeeds and ensuring
that the Code of Hermes is being maintained. When a magus or
covenant requests the intervention or investigation of the Quaestors
(to report a crime or any other incident of note), an Indagator
is usually dispatched to peruse the claims. The Indagator is
the next-to-lowest rank among the magi of House Quaestor, only
surpassing the Lictoris in stature. Typically an Indagator will
serve a specific Tribunal, traveling a circuit among the Hermetic
covenants located within its borders. The conventions for each
individual Tribunal vary, but often an Indagator traveling such
a circuit is required to visit every covenant within the Tribunal
within a certain time period (perhaps 5 years). Often the Indagator
will not originate from the Tribunal in which they themselves
were raised, lest they be biased or otherwise predisposed toward
the magi with whom they interact, or in a manner that might hinder
their impartiality (in fact, they often serve multiple Tribunals
during their career).
While Indagatoris are often young magi, many Quaestors are particularly
well-suited for investigatory efforts, and some quite powerful
magi remain in this post for their entire career. Most travel
alone, but there have been cases of two or even three investigators
arriving to explore and analyze particularly delicate situations.
In modern, 20th century terms they can be thought of as a synthesis
of both detective and prosecutor. When they arrive at a covenant,
the covenant is obligated to provide them shelter, food, and
protection for a fortnight. And while they may ask questions
of the Indagator, he is not required to respond. After the fortnight
has passed, the Covenant is no longer obliged to provide for
the Indagator, who usually departs. If however the Indagator
suspects a possible trasngression against the Code of Hermes
has transpired, they may announce an Indagatio (a formal
investigation), and will remain at the Covenant until the investigation's
conclusion. This requires the presentation of their own sigil
(a fasces), and demands cooperation of those being investigated
(who must submit to Intéllego magics and other forms of
scrying). The outcome of such a formal Indagatio is always reported
in written records within the House. By tradition, Indagatoris
tend to use restraint in the opening of investigations, lest
the authority of their House be eroded by petty scrying. Each
Tribunal is headed by a single investigator, the Indagator Primus,
but this rank is largely ceremonial and holds no additional privilege
(though it does confer honor within House Quaestor itself, reflecting
the superior talents of the investigator, who is consequently
dispatched to particularly important investigations).
It is within the Indagator's power to render decisions and dispense
penalties for low crimes (see the Code of Hermes for details
of such offenses). Such decisions are usually accepted, but it
is possible to appeal an Indagator's verdict. In this case the
punishment is indefinitely withheld and the matter is taken before
a Prætor at the earliest possible convenience (usually
within a few months, at several possible locations). The Prætor
will first hear the argument for guilt by the Indagator, and
then the defending magus (or magi) must respond to refute the
charges. The Prætor alone renders judgement. If he finds
for innocence then the case is dismissed (and the Indagator's
reputation may suffer), but if the Indagator's initial verdict
is upheld by the Prætor then the original penalty is doubled.
This doubling of a penalty was intended to discourage any frivolous
use of appeals. Successfully arguing such appeals should require
thorough role-playing, but at the Storyguide's discretion can
be benefited by delicate use of Disputatio, Intrigue, and Communication
by the character. Note that this previous discussion involves
the case of low crimes. In cases of high crimes, the Indagator
may not render judgement but rather must bring the matter to
a Prætor for a decision. All high crimes require the convening
of an Iudicium (a trial), which can only be opened by a Prætor,
though this is usually done at the urging of an Indagator, who
serves as prosecution in the case. To kill an Indagator is a
aggregious offense, and almost assuredly bestows a death penalty
to both the murderer and his accomplices. Note that the term
'Indagator' is masculine; female investigators are called Indagatrix
(plural Indagatricis).
- A Prætor is a magistrate, a Quaestor who presides
over criminal judgments. In fact they are often simply called
'Quaestors,' as befitting their role as true judges). According
to law, the Prætor must be at least 40 years old. In addition
to hearing appeals and rendering judgments for low crimes, a
Prætor can also convene an Iudicium (a court of
legal authority) to resolve a potential high crime. There are
two varieties of Prætoris; the first are called Prætor
Urbanus, who mitigate any disputes that remain confined to
a single Tribunal (all the subtleties of interest and parties
involved belong to the same Tribunal). If a dispute involves
magi or hermetic influences that encompass multiple Tribunals,
then a Prætor Peregrinus must be consulted. Note
that both of these varieties of Prætor are magistrates
who function in the same capacity; the distinction refers only
to their level of training (though it might reflect the prestige
of the Prætor).
- The Annalium Scriptor is a record-keeper of House
Quaestor, who chronicles the investigations, judgments, and outcomes
of all matters of Hermetic law (the conditions and results of
every Indagatio is detailed by the Scriptor). Within each Tribunal
there exists a single Scriptor, who must organize and preserve
the verdicts and conclusions of every case for future records.
The post is filled by a willing magus of House Quaestor, usually
of at least 40 years in age, by a majority vote of a quorum of
the Magi of House Quaestor within the Tribunal. Theirs is a sedentary
task, and they are rarely dispatched to actual sites of investigation
or courts, though this does happen infrequently. It is the responsibility
of the Annalium Scriptor to accompany the Praefectus (head
magistrate) to Tribunal meetings, and to convey his records to
each of the other Tribunals of the Order within an orderly fashion
(usually once every 10 to 12 years). In addition, the Scriptor
coordinates the organization of the Quaestors within the Tribunal,
conferring promotions, assigning Prætors to cases, designating
Indagatoris to investigate specific allegations, establishing
the routes they ply, and perhaps even acquiring new quaestors
from a distant Tribunal. All of these tasks are not always possible
for the Scriptor to regulate (for example, a trial may be convened
before the Scriptor can be notified), but when possible the Annalium
Scriptor is charged with such decisions, and has the authority
to make them. Sometimes a Scriptor will share these responsibilities
with the Praefectus, but this is not required. Each Scriptor
is assigned an individual Redcap or tabelarius (or perhaps
more) from House Mercere to expedite the delivery of messages
to and from the Scriptor within their Tribunal. By tradition
the Scriptor no longer performs any other duties as a Quaestor,
nor sits as a juror in a trial, nor votes at Tribunal. It is
a high crime to alter the Scriptor's records in any manner.
- The Praefectus is the head magistrate of a Tribunal.
Typically they are the most senior-ranking Prætoris within
a Tribunal, and it is their responsibility to attend and supervise
the Tribunal meetings, serving as head magistrate for any criminal
trials (iudicium) that are required. They are also responsible
for rendering all judgments of low crimes at a Tribunal meeting,
or dispensing that authority to one of the other Prætoris
in attendance if they wish. The minimum age of a Praefectus is
50, and they are required to have at least 10 years of experience
as a Prætor before assuming this post (unless this is made
impossible by the death of any other possible candidates; traditionally
a new Praefectus is selected according to their age, the most
senior Prætor within a Tribunal assuming the role). The
Praefectus usually resides within the specific Covenant in a
Tribunal that hosts the Tribunal meetings; however, this is not
demanded by law. They must also attend the Grand Tribunal or
appoint a replacement if their health does not permit such a
journey. In all other capacities, the Praefectus retains the
rights and privileges of a Prætor, and will continue to
perform his responsibilities in this capacity (which even includes
sitting as a judex in rare cases). While the Annalium Scriptor
arguably has more authority regarding the mundane operation of
the quaestors within the Tribunal, it is the sole power of the
Praefectus to depose the Annalium Scriptor for any abuse of office.
In addition to these formal ranks of House Quaestor, there
also exist twenty Quaestor Dignitus, whose limited authority
can transcend that of the normal offices of House Quaestor for
certain matters. These honorary magus-judges are members of another
Hermetic House who have been granted ceremonial membership to
House Quaestor in accordance with the Law of Hermes. They have
no authority to perform any of the normal duties of House Quaestor,
render any judgments or interpret Hermetic Law on their own, however
they can convene an assembly of their own officeholders to render
supreme judgment for the Order regarding particularly grave matters.
This rank was created by the Law of Hermes in order that every
House be adequately represented within the Order, and to ensure
that none be wrongfully persecuted or misjudged.
Iudicium
An Iudicium is a court of legal authority, which renders
judgement for any charges of high crimes against the Law of Hermes.
The Iudicium is presided over by a single Quaestor, who must hold
a minimum rank of Prætor. The Prætor dictates the
course of the proceeding, determining who may speak, what evidence
is admissible, when the trial shall commence, recess, or conclude,
and any other subject bearing on the trial. His authority is absolute.
Yet the Prætor alone does not render a verdict. This is
the responsibility of the Judex (the jurors), which must
be magi and can come from any Hermetic House as long as they remain
in good standing. In order to hold a legitimate court, the judex
must consist of at least 3 magi (although 5, 7, or 9 are sometimes
employed instead; always an odd number, and often depending upon
local traditions within the Tribunal). While it is standard practice
to have at least one magus from House Quaestor (of any rank) sit
as a judex, it is preferable to have the other judex derive from
differing Hermetic Houses when possible. This is not required,
and it is perfectly legal to hold a trial in which only magi of
House Quaestor sit as jurors. At the discretion of the presiding
Prætor, the trial will open and usually begins with a presentation
of the charges leveled against the offending magus. Typically
the principle Indagator that investigated the matter will present
such evidence, and serves the role of prosecutor. The defending
magus then argues their position, and may appeal to other magi
to speak on their behalf. In cases where two rival magi or factions
are in dispute, they simply argue their positions (the Prætor
dictates which side speaks first and the decorum of the argument).
Allowing non-magi to speak in a trial is a relatively uncommon
event, and may only be allowed with the consent of the Prætor
(who is sworn as always to fairness and impartiality). When the
trial is concluded, the judex render judgement by a secret vote.
In most cases a majority vote will suffice, though it is always
necessary to have a unanimous vote when a magus is to be cast
out of the Order or immediately slain (the Prætor himself
does not cast a vote, though has the right to break ties in that
unlikely event by rendering judgement directly). All judex must
have their sigil present, using it to cast their vote, and no
one can wield the sigil of another magus by proxy in a trial.
The individual votes of the judex are kept secret, and do not
appear in the written record of the trial. The verdicts of the
judex are not subject to discussion or negotiation, as the Prætor
normally uses his authority to dictate what outcomes they may
render (ie innocence, guilt, and precisely what punishments shall
be meted out).
Judex must swear an oath of honor and integrity at the beginning
of the Iudicium, and if it can be proved that they cast their
vote bowing to selfish considerations or for any reason whatsoever
that violates their oath of honesty, they too can be subject to
severe punishment (abusing one's vote in an Iudicium is a high
crime in and of itself). If a magus involved in a trial has reason
to doubt the integrity of a potential judex (for example they
belong to a rival Covenant), then they may ask the Prætor
to remove the judex from the trial before it commences (but never
after). By tradition, a Prætor will excuse any potential
judex without question or need of explanation on the first request.
If the same request is made of a subsequent judex however, the
Prætor may become more stingy, demanding explanations and
wary of intentional delays (whatever decision the Prætor
makes about the use of contested jurors is absolute). Replacing
jurors in this manner may delay the start of a trial, but considerable
haste is always made, and House Quaestor will endeavor to provide
judex from within their own ranks if other options fail. Most
Iudicium are held within Hermetic Covenants or other secure locales,
and are conducted with expedience. Any magus charged with a high
crime that leaves the Iudicium before its conclusion is assumed
guilty. To seek retribution against a judex or Quaestor for a
previous judgement is a high crime against the Order, typically
punishable by death or renouncement.
Usually, magi who belong to the same covenant as a mage who
is on trial are not posted as judex, but this is not a firm rule.
This page last modified on 10-Apr 1999.
Comments to madirishman@mad-irishman.net
Return
to the Rabenstein home page