Workings of House Quæstor (Quæsitor)

Symbol and Sigil
Ranks and Privileges
Iudicium


Symbol and Sigil

The singularly recognizable and often feared symbol of the Quaestors is the fasces (pronounced "FAS-eez" and meaning 'bundles'). This device is a collection of 21 wooden sticks or iron rods bundled tightly together and entwined with a leather strap. In the middle of the sticks and protruding from their top is a small double-bladed iron axe (since most fasces are only about one foot long, the miniature axe is merely symbolic, and in fact sometimes absent altogether; in this case the axe's presence is implied). Although they were Etruscan in origin, the fasces were a symbol of bureaucratic power and judicial law in ancient Rome. Magistrates bore them in public places to signify the authority of their rulings, and when the House of Quaestors was created within the Order, they adopted this Roman tradition. The sticks of the fasces symbolize the concentrated power of the different Houses of the Order, one stick representing each House (note that the Rabenstein and Corona Montis sagas use Additional Houses), while the blade of the axe they encompass denotes the absolute authority of the judgments of the Quaestors (it is the executioner's axe that the Etruscans used to enact capital justice).

Each Quaestor has their own fasces which they use not only to establish their rank and authority as a magistrate, but also as a Hermetic sigil. It is forbidden by the Code of Hermes to refute the authority of the bearer of a fasces. Conversely however, it is not required to recognize the authority of a Quaestor who does not bear their fasces (though it may prove imprudent to do so; thefts of fasces to delay or obstruct Hermetic justice have been known to occur, but rarely have the culprits not been subjected to serious punishments for this offense). Use of a fasces to confer authority by someone who is not a Quaestor is a high crime within the Order.

A unique fasces is employed by the head Quaestor of each of the individual Tribunal meetings (the Praefectus), whose rods are often over 3 feet long and surround a very real axe. Too large and unwieldy to be carried by a single person, these fasces are born by a procession of preceeding attendants called 'lictors' (normally younger Quaestors themselves). The central axe of this ceremonial fasces has been used to deliver Hermetic justice to renounced magi in the past, and in some Tribunals their blood stains smear the blade still, making the ceremonial entrance of the fasces into the regular Tribunal meetings an ominous moment. Note that the 20th century term 'Facsism' derives from the totalitarian authority conferred upon the wielder of the bundles.

Ranks and Privileges

While the power of jurisdiction of House Quaestor is well-established throughout the Order, the individual powers and responsibilities among the magi who comprise this House is considerably varied and highly regulated, to ensure that abuses do not occur and the rule of law prevails. Technically all members of the House may be called 'Quaestor,' meaning 'magistrate.' But this title is largely ceremonial and is typically preceded by the magus' formal rank. These offices are known throughout the Order (at least by those well-versed in Hermetic Law), and are detailed below (from lowest to highest):

Lictor
Indagator
Prætor Urbanus
Prætor Peregrinus
Annalium Scriptor
Præfectus

In addition to these formal ranks of House Quaestor, there also exist twenty Quaestor Dignitus, whose limited authority can transcend that of the normal offices of House Quaestor for certain matters. These honorary magus-judges are members of another Hermetic House who have been granted ceremonial membership to House Quaestor in accordance with the Law of Hermes. They have no authority to perform any of the normal duties of House Quaestor, render any judgments or interpret Hermetic Law on their own, however they can convene an assembly of their own officeholders to render supreme judgment for the Order regarding particularly grave matters. This rank was created by the Law of Hermes in order that every House be adequately represented within the Order, and to ensure that none be wrongfully persecuted or misjudged.

Iudicium

An Iudicium is a court of legal authority, which renders judgement for any charges of high crimes against the Law of Hermes. The Iudicium is presided over by a single Quaestor, who must hold a minimum rank of Prætor. The Prætor dictates the course of the proceeding, determining who may speak, what evidence is admissible, when the trial shall commence, recess, or conclude, and any other subject bearing on the trial. His authority is absolute. Yet the Prætor alone does not render a verdict. This is the responsibility of the Judex (the jurors), which must be magi and can come from any Hermetic House as long as they remain in good standing. In order to hold a legitimate court, the judex must consist of at least 3 magi (although 5, 7, or 9 are sometimes employed instead; always an odd number, and often depending upon local traditions within the Tribunal). While it is standard practice to have at least one magus from House Quaestor (of any rank) sit as a judex, it is preferable to have the other judex derive from differing Hermetic Houses when possible. This is not required, and it is perfectly legal to hold a trial in which only magi of House Quaestor sit as jurors. At the discretion of the presiding Prætor, the trial will open and usually begins with a presentation of the charges leveled against the offending magus. Typically the principle Indagator that investigated the matter will present such evidence, and serves the role of prosecutor. The defending magus then argues their position, and may appeal to other magi to speak on their behalf. In cases where two rival magi or factions are in dispute, they simply argue their positions (the Prætor dictates which side speaks first and the decorum of the argument). Allowing non-magi to speak in a trial is a relatively uncommon event, and may only be allowed with the consent of the Prætor (who is sworn as always to fairness and impartiality). When the trial is concluded, the judex render judgement by a secret vote. In most cases a majority vote will suffice, though it is always necessary to have a unanimous vote when a magus is to be cast out of the Order or immediately slain (the Prætor himself does not cast a vote, though has the right to break ties in that unlikely event by rendering judgement directly). All judex must have their sigil present, using it to cast their vote, and no one can wield the sigil of another magus by proxy in a trial. The individual votes of the judex are kept secret, and do not appear in the written record of the trial. The verdicts of the judex are not subject to discussion or negotiation, as the Prætor normally uses his authority to dictate what outcomes they may render (ie innocence, guilt, and precisely what punishments shall be meted out).

Judex must swear an oath of honor and integrity at the beginning of the Iudicium, and if it can be proved that they cast their vote bowing to selfish considerations or for any reason whatsoever that violates their oath of honesty, they too can be subject to severe punishment (abusing one's vote in an Iudicium is a high crime in and of itself). If a magus involved in a trial has reason to doubt the integrity of a potential judex (for example they belong to a rival Covenant), then they may ask the Prætor to remove the judex from the trial before it commences (but never after). By tradition, a Prætor will excuse any potential judex without question or need of explanation on the first request. If the same request is made of a subsequent judex however, the Prætor may become more stingy, demanding explanations and wary of intentional delays (whatever decision the Prætor makes about the use of contested jurors is absolute). Replacing jurors in this manner may delay the start of a trial, but considerable haste is always made, and House Quaestor will endeavor to provide judex from within their own ranks if other options fail. Most Iudicium are held within Hermetic Covenants or other secure locales, and are conducted with expedience. Any magus charged with a high crime that leaves the Iudicium before its conclusion is assumed guilty. To seek retribution against a judex or Quaestor for a previous judgement is a high crime against the Order, typically punishable by death or renouncement.

Usually, magi who belong to the same covenant as a mage who is on trial are not posted as judex, but this is not a firm rule.


This page last modified on 10-Apr 1999.

Comments to madirishman@mad-irishman.net

Return to the Rabenstein home page